Skip to content

Graded Quiz final :Negotiation Fundamentals (Negotiation, Mediation and Conflict Resolution Specialization) Answers 2026

Question 1

In preparing for your negotiation, objectives and interests must be taken into account. However, what are the two potential pitfalls in these?

  • Objectives are not so “objective” because they tend to include a sizeable amount of subjectivity.

  • ❌ Objectives – what to aim for – may be mistaken for strategy – how to get there.

  • ❌ Most negotiation stakes are not simply about the maximization of quantitative interests by rational individuals.

  • Interests may not be in line with a negotiator’s motivations.

Explanation

Objectives often reflect personal bias, and interests may differ from deeper motivations. These two create blind spots in preparation.


Question 2

Two key questions should be asked when analyzing the problem dimension. Which are correct?

  • ❌ How can I motivate myself to set the right objectives?

  • Deep inside, which motivations do I try to fulfill through negotiation – I want X, but why do I want X?

  • What do I know about the motivations of the other negotiator – why do they ask what they ask?

  • ❌ To what extent do we have common interests, which we do not need to discuss?

Explanation

Problem analysis focuses on underlying motivations, both yours and the other party’s—not self-motivation or hidden common interests.


Question 3

What is the difference between motivations and the mandate? Which two statements are correct?

  • ❌ The motivation is: I’d like to go as far as possible in that direction.

  • The motivation is: I’d like to get the best possible result in order to earn recognition from my agent.

  • The mandate is: my boss expects I go at least that far, and I must absolutely not step over this red line.

  • ❌ The mandate is: my boss sets me a bottom-line set of objectives and expects me to give it that extra bit of energy.

Explanation

Motivation is personal and internal, while mandate is externally imposed limits and expectations.


Question 4

Which word progression fits the tactical preparation statements?

  • ❌ Discussion, objective, solution, bargaining chip

  • ❌ Trade off, position, mandate, threat

  • ❌ Concession, concession, solution, solution

  • Discussion, concession path, solution, bargaining chip

Explanation

Tactical preparation revolves around anchoring discussion, planning concessions, proposing solutions, and reserving a bargaining chip.


Question 5

Three ways a solution will be accepted by the other side. Which are correct?

  • The solution is mutually satisfactory and aligns with both motivations.

  • ❌ Identify another item you dislike and agree on a trade-off.

  • ❌ Use a carrot and stick approach with threats.

  • Convince through objective justifications that are hard to deny.

Explanation

Acceptance comes from mutual value and objective justification, not coercion or forced trade-offs.


Question 6

Good negotiations will include two of the following. Which?

  • ❌ A unique solution that fits everyone’s needs.

  • A package deal solution addressing as many variables as possible.

  • ❌ A logical, proven set of standard solutions.

  • Creative, value-driven solutions tradable for mutual satisfaction.

Explanation

Strong negotiations expand value through packages and creative trade-offs, not rigid or one-size-fits-all solutions.


Question 7

Trading low-cost/high-value solutions and reciprocity is essential.

  • True

  • ❌ False

Explanation

This is the core principle of value creation and reciprocity in negotiation.


Question 8

Using justifications are powerful because they:

  • Allow refusal based on legitimacy rather than personal preference.

  • ❌ Provide destabilizing psychological attacks.

  • Help preserve the relationship by relying on facts.

  • Provide a base to explore alternative anchored solutions.

Explanation

Justifications strengthen credibility, fairness, and relationship management.


Question 9

Situation: “You will negotiate with someone you’ve never met before”

  • ❌ Providing explanations/apologies or bringing gifts.

  • Be aware of biases, show benevolence, and build a minimum working relationship.

  • ❌ You’ve established rapport and can move quickly.

Explanation

With new counterparts, the priority is trust-building and bias awareness.


Question 10

Situation: “You already know the person you are going to negotiate with”

  • ❌ Providing explanations/apologies or bringing gifts.

  • ❌ Be aware of biases and build a minimum relationship.

  • You’ve established rapport and trust; move rapidly to negotiation.

Explanation

A positive existing relationship allows faster transition to substance.


Question 11

Situation: “You’ve already met the person before but there was a problem”

  • Provide explanations/apology, consider a mediator if needed.

  • ❌ Be aware of biases and build a minimum relationship.

  • ❌ You’ve established rapport and trust.

Explanation

When trust is damaged, repair comes before negotiation substance.


🧾 Summary Table

Q.No ✅ Correct Answer(s) Key Concept
1 1, 4 Subjectivity & motivation mismatch
2 2, 3 Motivation analysis
3 2, 3 Motivation vs mandate
4 4 Tactical preparation
5 1, 4 Solution acceptance
6 2, 4 Value creation
7 True Reciprocity
8 1, 3, 4 Power of justification
9 2 New relationship handling
10 3 Existing positive relationship
11 1 Relationship repair