Task/Scenario Evaluation #3 :Introduction to UI Design (User Interface Design Specialization) Answers 2026

✅ Question 1

Does the response contain a task that makes sense for a calendar user?

• ✅ Yes

• ❌ No

Explanation:
The task aligns well with something a learner would realistically want or need to do in a calendar application.

✅ Question 2

Clarity of the task description

• ✅ Completely!

• ❌ Mostly

• ❌ Not very well

• ❌ No description provided

Explanation:
The task is clearly written and could be handed directly to a calendar user as instructions.

✅ Question 3

Is the task specific and concrete?

• ✅ Yes, well done!

• ❌ Mostly

• ❌ Parts too vague

• ❌ No description provided

Explanation:
The task is concrete, actionable, and unambiguous.

✅ Question 4

Does the task clearly state who is doing it?

• ✅ Yes, who is clear.

• ❌ Who implied

• ❌ Who not specified

Explanation:
The user context is clearly defined and sufficient for evaluation.

✅ Question 5

Is the task a complete job (not just a sub-step)?

• ✅ Yes, the task makes sense as a reasonably complete thing someone might want to do.

• ❌ Sub-task only

• ❌ No meaningful task

Explanation:
This is a full user goal, not merely one step of a larger process.

✅ Question 6

Is the task central and important to calendar design?

• ✅ Yes, this is a core, important step such that designing it poorly would hurt user experience substantially.

• ❌ Mostly

• ❌ Not really

• ❌ No meaningful task

Explanation:
This is a core calendar function; poor design here would significantly impact usability.

✅ Question 7

Any interface-dependent “how” instructions?

• ✅ No, there’s nothing interface-dependent. It is a pure task.

• ❌ Minor “how” elements

• ❌ Too specific about “how”

• ❌ No meaningful task

Explanation:
The task focuses on what the user wants to accomplish, not how the interface works.

✅ Question 8

Does the scenario identify action steps that match the task?

• ✅ Yes.

• ❌ Not quite

• ❌ Steps don’t match

• ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
The steps align directly and logically with the task.

✅ Question 9

Are the steps understandable to a typical user?

• ✅ Yes.

• ❌ Not quite

• ❌ No

• ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
The language and actions are appropriate for a typical calendar user.

✅ Question 10

Does the scenario include “what” as well as “how”?

• ❌ Just “how” steps

• ❌ Some “what” mixed in

• ✅ As much “what” as “how,” or maybe more.

• ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
The scenario clearly communicates intent and purpose, not just mechanics.

✅ Question 11

Is the action sequence reasonably correct?

• ✅ Yes.

• ❌ Mostly

• ❌ I don’t think so

• ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
The sequence is logical, complete, and realistic.

🧾 Summary Table