Skip to content

Task/Scenario Evaluation #1 :Introduction to UI Design (User Interface Design Specialization) Answers 2026

Question 1

Does the response contain a sensible retail customer task?

  • Yes

  • ❌ No

Explanation:
The task aligns with something a retail customer would reasonably want to do.


Question 2

Clarity of the task description

  • ❌ Completely

  • Mostly. The task has some areas that are less clear, but most shoppers could figure it out.

  • ❌ Not very well

  • ❌ No description provided

Explanation:
The task is understandable, though it could be tightened slightly.


Question 3

Specific and concrete task?

  • ❌ Yes, well done!

  • Mostly. A few minor issues, but generally concrete.

  • ❌ Parts too vague

  • ❌ No description / too abstract

Explanation:
The task is concrete enough to evaluate, with only minor vagueness.


Question 4

Clear statement of who is doing the task?

  • Yes, who is clear.

  • ❌ Who isn’t clear, but inferable

  • ❌ Who isn’t specified at all

Explanation:
The scenario provides enough user context to judge task suitability.


Question 5

Is this a complete job (not just a sub-step)?

  • Yes, the task makes sense as a reasonably complete thing someone might want to do.

  • ❌ More of a sub-task

  • ❌ No meaningful task

Explanation:
The task stands on its own as a full user goal.


Question 6

Is this task central and important to shopping-site design?

  • Yes, this is a core, important task.

  • ❌ Mostly

  • ❌ Not really

  • ❌ No meaningful task

Explanation:
Poor design of this task would significantly harm the user experience.


Question 7

Any interface-dependent “how” instructions?

  • No, there’s nothing interface-dependent. It is a pure task.

  • ❌ Minor “how” elements

  • ❌ Too specific about “how”

  • ❌ No meaningful task

Explanation:
The task focuses on what the user wants to accomplish, not how.


Question 8

Do scenario steps match the task?

  • Yes.

  • ❌ Not quite

  • ❌ Steps don’t match

  • ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
The scenario actions are aligned with the stated task.


Question 9

Are steps understandable to a typical user?

  • Yes.

  • ❌ Not quite

  • ❌ No

  • ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
Steps are written in user-friendly, understandable terms.


Question 10

Does the scenario include “what” vs just “how”?

  • ❌ Just “how” steps

  • ❌ Some “what” mixed in

  • As much “what” as “how,” or maybe more.

  • ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
Good scenarios emphasize intent (“what”), not just mechanics.


Question 11

Is the action sequence reasonably correct?

  • Yes.

  • ❌ Mostly

  • ❌ I don’t think so

  • ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
The sequence follows a logical, realistic flow.


🧾 Summary Table

Q# Best Evaluation Choice Key Skill Practiced
1 Yes Task relevance
2 Mostly clear Task clarity
3 Mostly concrete Specificity
4 Who is clear User context
5 Complete task Task completeness
6 Core task Design importance
7 No “how” bias Task vs implementation
8 Steps match task Scenario alignment
9 Understandable User language
10 Balanced “what/how” Good scenario writing
11 Correct sequence Logical flow