Skip to content

Task/Scenario Evaluation #2 :Introduction to UI Design (User Interface Design Specialization) Answers 2026

Question 1

Does the response contain a sensible smartwatch user task?

  • Yes

  • ❌ No

Explanation:
The task aligns with something a smartwatch user would reasonably want or need to do.


Question 2

Clarity of the task description

  • ❌ Completely!

  • Mostly. The task has some areas that are less clear, but most learners could figure it out.

  • ❌ Not very well

  • ❌ No description provided

Explanation:
The task is understandable but could be clearer or more concise in places.


Question 3

Is the task specific and concrete?

  • ❌ Yes, well done!

  • Mostly. A few minor issues, but generally concrete.

  • ❌ Parts too vague

  • ❌ No description / too abstract

Explanation:
The task is concrete enough to evaluate, with minor ambiguity.


Question 4

Clear statement of who is doing the task?

  • ❌ Yes, who is clear

  • Who isn’t clear in the text, though someone with smartwatch knowledge could probably figure it out.

  • ❌ Who isn’t specified at all

Explanation:
User context is implied rather than explicitly stated.


Question 5

Is this a complete job (not just a sub-step)?

  • ❌ Yes, complete job

  • The task is more of a sub-task that would never be done alone.

  • ❌ No meaningful task

Explanation:
The task feels like part of a larger activity rather than a full user goal.


Question 6

Is the task central and important for smartwatch design?

  • ❌ Yes, core and critical

  • Mostly. This doesn’t seem like a core task, but it is valuable.

  • ❌ Not really

  • ❌ No meaningful task

Explanation:
Important, but not one of the most critical smartwatch interactions.


Question 7

Any interface-dependent “how” instructions?

  • ❌ No, pure task

  • There are minor “how” elements, but it is mostly about “what.”

  • ❌ Too specific about “how”

  • ❌ No meaningful task

Explanation:
Some implementation details appear, but they don’t dominate the task.


Question 8

Do scenario steps match the task?

  • ❌ Yes

  • Not quite, but somewhat.

  • ❌ Steps don’t match

  • ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
Steps loosely align, but the mapping is imperfect.


Question 9

Are steps understandable to a typical smartwatch user?

  • ❌ Yes

  • Not quite, but somewhat.

  • ❌ No

  • ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
Most steps are understandable, though some may be unclear or unrealistic.


Question 10

Does the scenario include “what” vs just “how”?

  • ❌ Just “how” steps

  • Some “what” mixed in.

  • ❌ As much “what” as “how”

  • ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
The scenario includes intent occasionally, but leans toward procedural steps.


Question 11

Is the action sequence reasonably correct?

  • ❌ Yes

  • Mostly.

  • ❌ I don’t think so

  • ❌ No meaningful scenario

Explanation:
The sequence is plausible but not entirely clean or optimal.


🧾 Summary Table

Q# Best Evaluation Choice Key Evaluation Insight
1 Yes Task relevance
2 Mostly clear Instruction clarity
3 Mostly concrete Specificity
4 Who implied User context
5 Sub-task Task completeness
6 Mostly important Design priority
7 Minor “how” Task vs implementation
8 Somewhat aligned Scenario-task fit
9 Somewhat clear User language
10 Some “what” Scenario quality
11 Mostly correct Logical flow