Graded Quiz final :Negotiation Fundamentals (Negotiation, Mediation and Conflict Resolution Specialization) Answers 2026
Question 1
In preparing for your negotiation, objectives and interests must be taken into account. However, what are the two potential pitfalls in these?
-
✅ Objectives are not so “objective” because they tend to include a sizeable amount of subjectivity.
-
❌ Objectives – what to aim for – may be mistaken for strategy – how to get there.
-
❌ Most negotiation stakes are not simply about the maximization of quantitative interests by rational individuals.
-
✅ Interests may not be in line with a negotiator’s motivations.
Explanation
Objectives often reflect personal bias, and interests may differ from deeper motivations. These two create blind spots in preparation.
Question 2
Two key questions should be asked when analyzing the problem dimension. Which are correct?
-
❌ How can I motivate myself to set the right objectives?
-
✅ Deep inside, which motivations do I try to fulfill through negotiation – I want X, but why do I want X?
-
✅ What do I know about the motivations of the other negotiator – why do they ask what they ask?
-
❌ To what extent do we have common interests, which we do not need to discuss?
Explanation
Problem analysis focuses on underlying motivations, both yours and the other party’s—not self-motivation or hidden common interests.
Question 3
What is the difference between motivations and the mandate? Which two statements are correct?
-
❌ The motivation is: I’d like to go as far as possible in that direction.
-
✅ The motivation is: I’d like to get the best possible result in order to earn recognition from my agent.
-
✅ The mandate is: my boss expects I go at least that far, and I must absolutely not step over this red line.
-
❌ The mandate is: my boss sets me a bottom-line set of objectives and expects me to give it that extra bit of energy.
Explanation
Motivation is personal and internal, while mandate is externally imposed limits and expectations.
Question 4
Which word progression fits the tactical preparation statements?
-
❌ Discussion, objective, solution, bargaining chip
-
❌ Trade off, position, mandate, threat
-
❌ Concession, concession, solution, solution
-
✅ Discussion, concession path, solution, bargaining chip
Explanation
Tactical preparation revolves around anchoring discussion, planning concessions, proposing solutions, and reserving a bargaining chip.
Question 5
Three ways a solution will be accepted by the other side. Which are correct?
-
✅ The solution is mutually satisfactory and aligns with both motivations.
-
❌ Identify another item you dislike and agree on a trade-off.
-
❌ Use a carrot and stick approach with threats.
-
✅ Convince through objective justifications that are hard to deny.
Explanation
Acceptance comes from mutual value and objective justification, not coercion or forced trade-offs.
Question 6
Good negotiations will include two of the following. Which?
-
❌ A unique solution that fits everyone’s needs.
-
✅ A package deal solution addressing as many variables as possible.
-
❌ A logical, proven set of standard solutions.
-
✅ Creative, value-driven solutions tradable for mutual satisfaction.
Explanation
Strong negotiations expand value through packages and creative trade-offs, not rigid or one-size-fits-all solutions.
Question 7
Trading low-cost/high-value solutions and reciprocity is essential.
-
✅ True
-
❌ False
Explanation
This is the core principle of value creation and reciprocity in negotiation.
Question 8
Using justifications are powerful because they:
-
✅ Allow refusal based on legitimacy rather than personal preference.
-
❌ Provide destabilizing psychological attacks.
-
✅ Help preserve the relationship by relying on facts.
-
✅ Provide a base to explore alternative anchored solutions.
Explanation
Justifications strengthen credibility, fairness, and relationship management.
Question 9
Situation: “You will negotiate with someone you’ve never met before”
-
❌ Providing explanations/apologies or bringing gifts.
-
✅ Be aware of biases, show benevolence, and build a minimum working relationship.
-
❌ You’ve established rapport and can move quickly.
Explanation
With new counterparts, the priority is trust-building and bias awareness.
Question 10
Situation: “You already know the person you are going to negotiate with”
-
❌ Providing explanations/apologies or bringing gifts.
-
❌ Be aware of biases and build a minimum relationship.
-
✅ You’ve established rapport and trust; move rapidly to negotiation.
Explanation
A positive existing relationship allows faster transition to substance.
Question 11
Situation: “You’ve already met the person before but there was a problem”
-
✅ Provide explanations/apology, consider a mediator if needed.
-
❌ Be aware of biases and build a minimum relationship.
-
❌ You’ve established rapport and trust.
Explanation
When trust is damaged, repair comes before negotiation substance.
🧾 Summary Table
| Q.No | ✅ Correct Answer(s) | Key Concept |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1, 4 | Subjectivity & motivation mismatch |
| 2 | 2, 3 | Motivation analysis |
| 3 | 2, 3 | Motivation vs mandate |
| 4 | 4 | Tactical preparation |
| 5 | 1, 4 | Solution acceptance |
| 6 | 2, 4 | Value creation |
| 7 | True | Reciprocity |
| 8 | 1, 3, 4 | Power of justification |
| 9 | 2 | New relationship handling |
| 10 | 3 | Existing positive relationship |
| 11 | 1 | Relationship repair |